Supreme Court Grants Conditional Approval For Army Chief’s Extension For Six Months
The Supreme court of Pakistan on Wednesday granted conditional approval for the extension of the tenure of Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa for six more months.
A 3-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, has granted the Parliament six months to come up with law regarding the extension of the Chief of Army Staff, General Qamar Javed Bajwa.
The Supreme Court was initially set to grant three months to the Parliament to come up with a new law but the Attorney General of Pakistan, Anwar Mansoor Khan requested the court to grant the lawmakers six months which was finally granted after much deliberation and discussions.
A detailed verdict will be published soon…
Chaudhry Shujaat slams Indian media; says nation direly needs General Bajwa
Meanwhile, Pakistan Muslim League Quaid-e-Azam (PML-Q) chief Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain slammed the Indian media on Wednesday and hailed Chief Of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa.
The PML-Q chief said that General Bajwa was a capable general and that the appointment of the army chief was done through an organized process.
He slammed Indian media for meddling in Pakistan’s political affairs.
“The Indian media has targeted Pakistan Army, our judiciary and government,” he said. “This is Pakistan’s internal issue, India or any other country has no involvement with it.”
Shujaat said that the entire nation stood with the armed forces and that if India ever tried any misadventure, it would have to pay a very heavy cost for it.
“General Bajwa has defeated all conspiracies against the country,” he said. “Pakistan Army has the capability to defend the nation.”
Shujaat said that he fully supported the prime minister’s decision to grant General Bajwa an extension in tenure as the army chief.
Supreme Court Adjourned Army chief ‘s Extension Case Till 1 PM
Earlier, the Supreme Court adjourned hearing the petition challenging a three-year extension in Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa’s tenure Thursday. The hearing was to resume at 1 pm.
It adjourned Wednesday’s hearing after six hours. The case was initially filed by the Jurists’ Foundation but after it asked to withdraw the case, the court decided to take it up against itself.
Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel heard the case.
On Tuesday, the court suspended the official notification that extended the army chief ’s tenure. Farogh Naseem resigned as a federal law minister to represent General Bajwa in the case.
During Wednesday’s hearing, the judges noted that the notification from the president’s office extending General Bajwa’s tenure was an extension, not a reappointment. Attorney-General Anwar Mansoor Khan said the prime minister had recommended a reappointment. The judges quizzed the country’s top law officer on the laws governing the army chief’s appointment and tenure.
The court was also informed that the army chief’s tenure expires on Friday at midnight.
Farogh Naseem’s membership of the Pakistan Bar Council has been restored.
Today’s hearing in Supreme Court to decide COAS fate
It was said that generals never retired, said Justice Khosa, Cheif Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. If they never retire then what is their source of income, he asked. He summoned the complete details of this from the attorney general in 15 minutes.
The court summoned details of former COAS General (retd) Raheel Sharif’s retirement and General (retd) Ashfaq Parvez Kayani’s extension.
AGP Khan said the army chief has been reappointed under Article 243. Justice Khosa asked how today’s appointment was different from the previous one. Khan replied that today’s appointment was under Article 243 (4) B. You will have to satisfy us on how this appointment is valid, said Justice Khosa.
The summary mentions the judicial investigation into the matter, noted Justice Khosa. Shoulder the burden yourselves, he said. Why are you trying to use our shoulders, he asked.
He ordered the AGP to remove the court’s name from the summary. He told the AGP to specifically remove the part referencing the court’s advice from the summary. If the president wants our advice, that is a different matter, he said.
We will see whether the appointment is legal or not, he added.
The chief justice observed that the reappointment had been made from November 28 (today). But today General Bajwa is already the army chief, so how can a reappointment be made on a post that is not empty, he asked.
Justice Shah noted that there is no mention of tenure of three years in the law. He said the appointment must be according to the law.
Justice Khosa noted that extensions had been given before and no one took notice. No one looked at what’s happening in the cantonments, he said. Now the court of law is looking into it, he said.
The CJP added that the law must clearly mention the appointment procedure. Justice Shah noted that the summary did not mention the army chief’s salary or privileges.
Yesterday, when we looked at the Army Act, there were calls of Indian and CIA agents, said the chief justice. The attorney general replied that India took advantage of the arguments in court.
We were made a part of “fifth generation warfare”, said Justice Khosa, reminding everyone that it is the court’s right to ask questions.
Justice Shah observed that yesterday was probably the first time the AGP had read the army laws. Suggest how we should amend the army laws, he told the AGP.
The extension notification says three years, noted Justice Khosa. If we got an amazing general, perhaps the extension summary would have 30 years written on it, he said.
This three-year appointment will now become a precedent, he said. The government may want to keep the next army chief for just one year, he said.
It should be clear whether or not a general gets a pension, said Justice Shah.
After his tenure ends, a general retires, said the attorney general. But yesterday you said generals don’t retire, reminded Justice Shah.
He said there is no better forum than Parliament to fix the system. If Parliament updates the Army Act, new rules can be made, said Justice Khosa.
I see 18 different errors in the law, said AGP Khan. Regardless of these errors, we respect the law, said Justice Khosa.
Justice Miankhel said it should also be clarified whether in the future it will be an extension or reappointment.
The attorney general assured the court that the Army Act would be put before the cabinet and necessary changes would be made.
Justice Khosa noted that this is the first time the government has returned to the Constitution. When anything is done according to the law, our hands are tied, he said. Don’t use the court’s shoulders, he warned.
He said Article 243 did not mention a three-year appointment. A three-year appointment has become a precedent but it is not legal, he said.
If the court extends the appointment, it will become precedent, said the CJP. AGP Khan said where a fixed term has not been mentioned, it is determined by the situation. It seems like at the time of the appointment, the government read Article 243 and increased it, said Justice Khosa.
Extending the army chief’s tenure is not constitutional tradition, said Justice Khosa.
Of the past three army chiefs, one received an extension, while the other did not, noted the CJP. Now the third army chief seems to be getting an extension, he observed. If you’re making appointments under Article 243 then remove the tenure duration, said Justice Khosa.
At least completely follow Article 243, said Justice Shah. But an indefinite appointment can’t be made either, said the AGP. General Bajwa was initially appointed for an unspecified duration as well, noted Justice Khosa.
We will need time to make a new law, said the AGP. In 72 years you weren’t able to make a new law, how will you make it so fast, asked Justice Khosa. We will try to do it in three months, replied the AGP.
We will make a separate law pertaining to the army chief, he vowed.
The court asked whether it should approve a three-month extension.
The documents relating to General (retd) Kayani’s extension were presented in court. It doesn’t say anywhere who gave General Kayani the extension, noted Justice Khosa.
You should also mention the law under which the extension was granted, he said. This is an important position, there should be no confusion, he said.
The CJP noted that General (retd) Sharif was drawing a pension. But the rules don’t mention a pension for generals, he observed.
We respect the people in government, said the chief justice. But the Constitution and law are the most respected, he said.
The chief justice once again said that the court had nothing to do with the government’s summaries. When the notification is not according to Article 243, how can it be valid, asked Justice Shah?
How can we say a three-year tenure is according to the law when tenure is not mentioned in Article 243, asked Justice Khosa.
Naseem promised the court that they would remove any mention of it in the government’s summary and enact a law within three months. How long will it take to fix the summary and notification, asked the chief justice?
To get all the signatures, the person doing it will have to go around the whole city, said AGP Khan. He vowed that the corrections would be made in three days.
Should the army chief handle the country’s defense or sit with you and look over legal mistakes, asked the chief justice. The AGP said that each time they read the Constitution, new things pop up. The first time we read it, something pops up, countered the CJP.
He said the court would announce the verdict this evening after deliberations. If the corrections are made by this afternoon, it would be better, he said, directing the government to present the amended notification and summary by 1 pm.
Read even more: Indian SC Rules To Build Temple On Babri Mosque Land!